The Valley Of Discontent – Charlton Athletic In Trouble
On the final day of the 2005/2006 Premier League season Charlton Athletic made the journey to Old Trafford to play Manchester United. Sitting comfortably in mid-table, the game was most notable for being Addicks manager Alan Curbishley’s final game in charge of the South East London club.
After fifteen years of steady and admirable progress he had decided to stand down, with plans to take a well-earned break from management. Curbishley ended his stint in charge as the second most successful manager in Charlton history behind Jimmy Seed.
By and large most fans were grateful to Curbishley and sad to see him go. But there also existed from some quarters a lingering undercurrent of satisfaction and even contentment that he was leaving. A section of the club’s supporters were of the opinion that, after six seasons of mid-table comfort, it was time for a change, time for a new manager with fresh ideas to take over and push the club higher up the table, towards the ultimate goal of European football. Time for a change of direction, a modern approach, a new Charlton Athletic.
Be careful what you wish for.
Fast forward three years and, following relegation in 2007, the Addicks are now bottom of the Championship. Defeat to fellow relegation candidates Nottingham Forest on 10th January leaves them seven points adrift of safety and, without a win in 17 league games, looking an increasingly likely candidate to plummet into the third tier of English football for the first time in 28 years.
If you had told the travelling supporters there to wish Curbishley farewell at Old Trafford on that cool afternoon back in May 2006 that, three years later, they would be facing the prospect of league games with Hartlepool United and Northampton Town, or London derbies at Leyton Orient and Dagenham and Redbridge instead of at Arsenal or Chelsea, you would most likely have been laughed at, cursed or derided as a Crystal Palace fan. Nonetheless, the unthinkable is rapidly becoming a reality.
So where did it all go wrong for the Addicks?
Well, rather ironically for a club with traditions of financial frugality, the roots of their downfall can be traced back to a post-Curbishley period of lavish spending that ultimately appears to have backfired. Charlton in the Premier League held a reputation for being thrifty in the transfer market, thanks to a board often reluctant to spend money.
When Iain Dowie took over from Curbishley however things changed. The club’s board decided on a break from the norm and, keen to back their man, handed Dowie a warchest of around £12 million pounds. This amount of money was the 2006/2007 season’s budget and then some.
Chairman Richard Murray was eager to consolidate Charlton’s Premier League status and secure a slice of the lucrative new TV deal that was to come into force the following year. So eager in fact that he also permitted the spending of a large chunk of the projected budget for 2007/2008, in order to provide Dowie with more dough for both transfers and increased wages. ‘It was a risk worth taking,’ Murray commented at the time. He was wrong.
No doubt a direct result of this uncharacteristic financial irresponsibility, Iain Dowie’s poor start as manager immediately got the Charlton board twitchy. With most of next season’s money spent already relegation was not an option, but that’s exactly where the club found itself as early as November – stuck in a relegation battle. Rendered jittery by the club’s shaky predicament, the board panicked. Dowie was sacked after just 15 games. His predecessor had been there for 15 years.
Overall, in 2006/2007 Charlton spent £17.5 million. That is more than was spent in the previous four years combined. This botched financial strategy aligned with the mishandled start to a season which saw the club go through three managers before Christmas cost Charlton dear, and ultimately resulted in their relegation to the Championship, from where they have struggled to return.
It was widely believed that with Alan Pardew in charge the Addicks would bounce back into the top flight at the first time of asking, but he disappointed as manager of the club he once played for and with both results and performances in steady decline was eventually sacked.
The club’s financial woes did not end there. Despite the aid of parachute payments Charlton recently announced net losses of £11.5m for the year ending June 2008 and have subsequently had to cut their cloth accordingly. Best players and high earners are now readily being auctioned off. Club captain Zheng Zhi is rumoured to be next in line for the Valley exit doors.
Financial mismanagement and poor decision-making at both board and managerial level, from 2006 to the present day, are certainly contributing factors to the Addicks current decline but there is also another, perhaps overlooked factor that has caused the club disruption.
At supporter level a deep unrest has set in. Fans in the Alan Pardew era and beyond have been gradually positioning themselves either side of the fuzzy line between getting behind a struggling team and informing players in no uncertain terms (usually via boos, jeers and angry derision) of their deep dissatisfaction. The resulting juxtaposition of feeling between these two contrasting groups has rendered the Valley a more poisonous place to be than usual.
Shortly before being sacked Pardew used his programme notes to aim s
ubtle criticism at what he perceived as a lack of support from Charlton’s home fans, and was also seen sarcastically applauding them after a 5-2 home defeat to Sheffield United that was to prove his last match in charge. All this is a great departure from the club that used to look proudly upon itself as the Charlton ‘family’.
With nineteen league games left all is not lost for the Addicks though. There are some positives to consider as they embark on the long hard escape mission. Phil Parkinson is talking optimistically, and has cited the need to instil a ‘never-say-die attitude’ if they are to escape from the dropzone. And in 16-year old Jonjo Shelvey, a young attacking midfielder you are certain to hear more of in the future, they boast at least one player blessed with the skill, swagger and, importantly, confidence to help them get points on the board.
But if Charlton Athletic wish to stay up this season they need to start racking points up sooner rather than later.
Charlton Athletic, English Championship, Rise and Fall



not much to say about poor Charlton, except GOOD LUCK. as for their downfall, I would not blame the spend spree, but rather blame a coach (Dowie) who was unable to build a team with new stars (of his liking) as well as the Board. what happened with the board?
lessoned learn: don’t change a team that wins!
A well written piece that looks at the strategic decline rather than knee jerk at the current season performance.
You mention the original gamble with Dowie, but there was second gamble with Pardew last season, when the Board allowed Pardew to keep a large squad on Premiership wages and then agreed to finance numerous loan signings that played ahead players that he had bought.
Us fickle fans still called for more, not realising that the Board had already been over generous. In hindsight we should have sold wholesale when we went down, and rebuilt on lower wage players.
The second gamble failed, and has now turned into potential disaster. If it had worked (and we all thought Pardew was the bees knees to start with)the Board would have been hailed. We’ve all played our part in this – but I just would have expected the Board to have been closer to the figures 12 months ago.
But for Charlton read Leicester, Norwich, Southampton, Watford, Coventry, etc. Getting it right when you first come down is the challenge.
Pembury Addick
The key for clubs like Leicester, Norwich, Southampton, Coventry, Derby and now ourselves, is that when you survive in the premiership for a number of years, slowly, everything about your club becomes reliant on a premiership income. Everyone from the caterers and cleaners to back-room assistants and coaching staff are all on higher wages and longer contracts.
Most costly of all the players ‘demand’ higher wages and get out clauses for relegation. Even if you’re fighting relegation battles every year, your players will believe they are ‘premiership quality’ and refuse to sign clauses that halve their wages in the event of relegation etc. The same can be said when trying to sign new players, who will be auctioned to the highest bidder by their agent.
Teams like Watford, Sheffield United, West Brom, Birmingham, Reading and Wolves have become known for Yo-Yo-ing but when this happens, flexability ‘has’ to be built into the system. If Hull or Stoke get relegated this year, they will be in a far better state than if it were a Blackburn or a West Ham. Even worse, if Portsmouth or Fulham get relegated and don’t make it back in the first 2 attempts, they’ll almost certainly go into free fall. Trying to maintain mid table premiership status comes at a hidden ‘cost’.
Finaly, just a comment re. the fans view of Curbishley. I have always been of the opinion that the media greatly exaggerated the ‘we want to move on to the next stage/level view. It makes a meaty and vindicating story that the greedy ungrateful fans have now got what they deserved. This is simply ball-cocks. Curbishley’s last 2 seasons were absolutely appalling. Yes, we finished mid table, but there was certainly no comfort in it. We were constantly robbing results and hanging on to the luck pony at full speed. Everyone knew a relegation season was coming soon if there weren’t wholesale squad changes. If there’s mixed views of curbs, its becasue although he rightly deserves praise for helping make the club what it is today, he also covered the pitch with 75% manure and jumped ship.
Some excellent points made here guys, thanks for contributing.
With regards the difficulty of clubs staying afloat once relegated from the Premier League, its definitely a compelling point made that the clubs who do not expect to go down will find it harder not to free-fall in the lower leagues than those smaller clubs who come up and are expected, even prepared, to go straight back down.
While the parachute payments no doubt help, it seems to me that rather than over-extending resources in an attempt to win instant promotion back to the PL it would be more prudent for such clubs to adopt a strict policy of shipping out high earners, reducing wages and simply cutting one’s cloth accordingly by looking to recruit players at a cheaper cost in these situations, no matter the possibility of inferior talent. Investing in cheap but promising youth for example, rather than maintaining underachievers on PL wages.
Of course this is easier said than done particularly with fans’ expectations to juggle, but better to be a stable Championship club for one or two seasons than to free-fall into League One and possibly beyond.
The thing is that, as hinted at by both Pembury Addick and anonymous, this predicament is no longer really an anomaly. So many clubs are suffering the fate of double relegations (Leicester, Forest, Leeds, Man City, Sheffield Wednesday, Charlton [?]), that it can no longer be considered a coincidence.
As for the point about Curbishley, while I can understand the opinion that some sections of the media may have exaggerated the point to depict a starker story, I don’t think its unfair to say that a decent proportion of Charlton fans did want a change. I know a few personally.
Whether or not his last two seasons in charge were ‘appalling’ as you say is of course a matter of opinion, but do you honestly think Charlton would be in the same situation now if Curbishley had stayed? I am not so sure.